Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

by hippo (Curate)
on Jun 06, 2014 at 15:46 UTC ( #1089048=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?
in thread Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

Thanks to both of you for these clarifications. It sounds like this will be the only significant hurdle and that it can be overcome (or at least dodged) by out of band means. One step is to maintain a page elsewhere with clear and easy access to the lastest legacy version. In tandem with this, the docs for the newer version should point to that page and ideally the installation process should check the running version of perl and error out if it is too old with a suitable message to point to the legacy version.

For now, this seems like the best approach. It should give the legacy users enough pointers to their newest version and allow me to develop and release both branches independently.

Thanks everyone for your very useful comments.


Comment on Re^3: Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1089048]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-10-02 18:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    What is your favourite meta-syntactic variable name?














    Results (69 votes), past polls