Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

by DrHyde (Prior)
on Jun 11, 2014 at 10:23 UTC ( #1089514=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

Others have pointed out some stuff about how the indexer works. If the existing module is Foo::Bar and you want both that and the new one to be indexed you'd probably want to release the incompatible modernist version as something like Foo::Bar2. See Dancer and Dancer2.

Until a few years ago I would have agreed with you that maintaining backward compatibility was important - although I wouldn't go so far as to support 5.002, I used to strive to support 5.6.2. But these days I don't bother. That's what CP5.6.2AN and its many friends and relations are for.

  • Comment on Re: Is maintaining multiple versions of a CPAN module a terrible idea?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1089514]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (12)
As of 2016-06-29 17:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My preferred method of making French fries (chips) is in a ...











    Results (385 votes). Check out past polls.