Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: SMTP.pm & LWP Conflict - Internal response 500 from LWP

by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 17, 2014 at 02:37 UTC ( #1090097=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: SMTP.pm & LWP Conflict - Internal response 500 from LWP
in thread SMTP.pm & LWP Conflict - Internal response 500 from LWP

Hmm, lets see, the last version of LWP is 6.06, and IO-Socket-SSL is 1.993 ....

Try the latest versions not old ones

  • Comment on Re^3: SMTP.pm & LWP Conflict - Internal response 500 from LWP

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: SMTP.pm & LWP Conflict - Internal response 500 from LWP
by DaisyLou (Acolyte) on Jun 17, 2014 at 20:16 UTC
    Is there a clever way I can do that without losing the existing one in case it causes trouble? I don't have a staging environment to test this on.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1090097]
help
Chatterbox?
[shmem]: you can break up the chain MP3::Tag->new($_)- >interpolate("\%S ") and test whether MP3::Tag->new($_) is true
[Lady_Aleena]: shmem, no to deletion.
[shmem]: can't help you there since that song is not on my bench
[Lady_Aleena]: shmem, I need to look at MP3::Tag to see how to get the date from one song.
shmem sticks himself into the envelope. gn.(1<<3) all

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (6)
As of 2017-04-23 22:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:











    Results (432 votes). Check out past polls.