Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: When I want to check the accuracy of some widely held belief, I use:

by chacham (Prior)
on Jun 20, 2014 at 13:02 UTC ( #1090619=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: When I want to check the accuracy of some widely held belief, I use:
in thread When I want to check the accuracy of some widely held belief, I use:

Newsflash: Statements that end with exclamation points are false!

Ironically, the exclamation point takes the shebang out of it.

  • Comment on Re^2: When I want to check the accuracy of some widely held belief, I use:

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: When I want to check the accuracy of some widely held belief, I use:
by ChuckularOne (Parson) on Jun 20, 2014 at 13:24 UTC
    Hmmm... So the irony of your intrinsic irony is that it causes the following conundrum: Should up or down vote that. :-)

      Should up or down vote that.

      Yes, yes you should. (Hard as it was, i withheld the exclamation point from that sentence!)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1090619]
help
Chatterbox?
[markong]: " Perl: the Markov chain saw" :D aha
[Discipulus]: thanks 1nickt but seems i'm not able to use it correctly...
[Discipulus]: Eily i'm testing a failure: i ok if i get bad results.. perhaps there is another way to do it...
[Discipulus]: in other words: i have a contructor that carps on missing arguments and I want to test that it fails correctly, without carping out in the test output

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-01-22 11:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?










    Results (233 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?