Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Is there a policy on updating RFCs?

by RonW (Friar)
on Jun 30, 2014 at 20:12 UTC ( #1091769=monkdiscuss: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

I have posted an RFC in Meditations. I have made some significant updates to it, but updated nodes don't seem to count as "new". I hesitate to post a new meditation as I don't want to spam PM.

I have searched the FAQ and PM discussions, but I may have missed something.

Comment on Is there a policy on updating RFCs?
Re: Is there a policy on updating RFCs?
by jdporter (Canon) on Jun 30, 2014 at 22:31 UTC

    If, as you say, it's a significant update, then post a new Meditation. You might include a "version" identifier in the title. And absolutely please do include a link to the old post in the new one. And updating the old one to point to the new one is an extremely good idea.

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

      Replying to the old root node is often a good choice, especially if the original isn't that old. Just put a link at the top of the old root node pointing to the latest version (whether it is a reply or a new node).

      - tye        

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: monkdiscuss [id://1091769]
Front-paged by davies
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2014-10-31 05:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    For retirement, I am banking on:










    Results (214 votes), past polls