Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Perl vs Lisp/Java/C/C++

by jryan (Vicar)
on Sep 09, 2001 at 02:22 UTC ( #111210=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl vs Lisp/Java/C/C++

I would expect Perl to do quite well in comparisons to other languages. Much of the langauge is EXTREMELY optimized, so programs written in Perl would run at least 80% as fast as a comparable one written in C/C++. Besides, you can always compile Perl into C for even a faster runtime. I've also heard that a Perl interpreted program runs faster than a comparable Java bytecode program as well. In the size of code catagory, Perl would win hands down (can anyone say "one liners"? :p ). Finally, I don't see why modules wouldn't be allowed. Modules are one of Perl's main strenghts, and speed up development time tremendously. All in all, I think Perl would stack up very well.


Comment on Re: Perl vs Lisp/Java/C/C++

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://111210]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (14)
As of 2015-07-03 11:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (51 votes), past polls