Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Perl vs Lisp/Java/C/C++

by jryan (Vicar)
on Sep 09, 2001 at 02:22 UTC ( #111210=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Perl vs Lisp/Java/C/C++

I would expect Perl to do quite well in comparisons to other languages. Much of the langauge is EXTREMELY optimized, so programs written in Perl would run at least 80% as fast as a comparable one written in C/C++. Besides, you can always compile Perl into C for even a faster runtime. I've also heard that a Perl interpreted program runs faster than a comparable Java bytecode program as well. In the size of code catagory, Perl would win hands down (can anyone say "one liners"? :p ). Finally, I don't see why modules wouldn't be allowed. Modules are one of Perl's main strenghts, and speed up development time tremendously. All in all, I think Perl would stack up very well.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://111210]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (3)
As of 2017-11-24 17:35 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    In order to be able to say "I know Perl", you must have:













    Results (351 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?