Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: How do I go from functional to object oriented programming?

by Jenda (Abbot)
on Apr 20, 2015 at 23:32 UTC ( #1124092=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to How do I go from procedural to object oriented programming?

$functional ne $procedural

I seriously doubt you are comming from Haskell, Clean, oCaml or Lisp.

Update after Lady_Aleena's update: within this program all your subroutines are functions. The naming of the programming paradigms is a little confusing and the distinction is fairly blurred by gradual introduction of originally functional concepts to (mainly) imperative languages and imperative features to (some mainly) functional languages.

Jenda
Enoch was right!
Enjoy the last years of Rome.

  • Comment on Re: How do I go from functional to object oriented programming?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: How do I go from procedural to object oriented programming?
by Lady_Aleena (Curate) on Apr 21, 2015 at 02:57 UTC

    Jenda, many many moons ago, I was talking with someone, I can not remember who, in the chatterbox; and he, I remember the person being male, called my subroutines "functions". Since then I have thought of my subroutines as "functions". It appears I have been wrong in my thinking. I do tend to have a lot of faith in the people I talk with in the chatterbox so I do not fact check them when they tell me something (unless it sounds so absurd I have to verify). This is an easy shift in my thinking unlike going from procedural programming to object oriented programming.

    You are invited to change the name of your reply node to reflect the correction (functional to procedural) as are all of the other respondents. I have made the change in the title of this node.

    Thank you for stopping by and correcting this minor(?) error.

    Special note: This is my 300th node.

    No matter how hysterical I get, my problems are not time sensitive. So, relax, have a cookie, and a very nice day!
    Lady Aleena
      You can keep calling your subroutines functions even if they are procedures. Everybody calls them functions inside the context of imperative programming.

      Functional programming was a obscure thing until a few* years ago. If I recall correctly, the popular meaning for functional programming back them was "programming using functions as first class objects". For instance, Lisp was considered a functional programming language because it was able to build, pass and call functions and closures at runtime, in opposition to other lower level languages as C which didn't support closures and couldn't build functions dynamically.

      Then, the *real* functional programming wave toke over, there was an explosion of new functional languages and functional programming became synonymous to using functions without side effects as in the mathematical sense.

      Nowadays, the name "function" is still used to designate procedures. Any programmer using an imperative language as C/C++, Python, Perl or even old-school functional languages as Lisp will use the term "function" to designate both functions and procedures. Very few would take the time to consider the difference and state it explicitly. AFAIK, the only imperative language making a difference between functions and procedures is Eiffel and then it uses a completely different nomenclature.

      In summary, you can call your subs functions even if you don't do functional programming. And say that you do procedural programming, or more commonly, imperative programming (that subsumes both the procedural and object oriented paradigms).

      *) I would say until around the turn of the millennium... but it is quite subjective.

        There are other languages that distinguish between functions and procedures with function meaning "a subroutine that does return a value" and procedure meaning "a subroutine that doesn't return anything". For example Pascal or any procedural extension to SQL I've ever seen. (Microsoft's TSQL, Oracles PL/SQL, ...)

        I think it's actually a little unlucky that C books speak about "void functions" rather than "procedures".

        Jenda
        Enoch was right!
        Enjoy the last years of Rome.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1124092]
help
Chatterbox?
and a kettle whistles...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-06-26 18:02 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?















    Results (585 votes). Check out past polls.