Re^2: [OT] A C-language parser test file?


Keep It Simple, Stupid
	PerlMonks

Re^2: [OT] A C-language parser test file?

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)

on Aug 27, 2015 at 13:45 UTC ( [id://1140206]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: [OT] A C-language parser test file?
in thread [OT] A C-language parser test file?

You mean like this? Or this?

None of them are what I'm hoping for. They are intimately entwined with the testing philosophies and tools of the projects they are a part of; they cover the full variety of C-like languages; are broken up into dozens of separate files.

Maybe what I want doesn't exist; but maybe it does and someone here knows where.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". I knew I was on the right track :)

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

I'm with torvalds on this Agile (and TDD) debunked I told'em LLVM was the way to go. But did they listen!

Comment on Re^2: [OT] A C-language parser test file?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: [OT] A C-language parser test file? (gcc?)
by tye (Sage) on Aug 27, 2015 at 17:36 UTC

I found https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/C-Tests.html which I then found better access to at https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/tree/master/gcc/testsuite (the first link is actually talking about the gcc.dg subdirectory of the second). Lots of stuff in there so I didn't go trawling through there trying to guess if any of it might suite your needs.

A compliance test suite would be a nice addition to something that has such a robust standard defined for it. I thought that was a fairly common thing for those old-style standards where you have to pay to get an official copy.

- tye

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom