|more useful options|
Behavior of 'our' variables in the package-namespaceby Apero (Scribe)
|on Nov 02, 2015 at 01:44 UTC||Need Help??|
Apero has asked for the
wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:
I'm trying to define an OO package that the main:: package will use, and wish to include some common variables that the package will need to reference across all object use (constructors, methods, and so on.)
As a convenience, I'm including the OO package in the same file as the main:: code, ideally at the end as I do not wish to confuse users (read: other staff who don't need to know/care) who may want to learn how the high-level code works or make changes.
Here's where I ran into behavior which I don't really understand. If I put my OO class, called Foo::Bar in the examples below, in the same file at the end, Perl does not let me reference the globally-scoped package namespace variable $Foo::Bar::data within methods of this class. However, if I use the same package code and require or use it from an external library, it seems the non-subroutine (ie: method/constructor/etc) code in the class is run.
I've learned that I can work-around this by using a forward-declaration with our(), combined with a BEGIN block to initialize the package globals. This seems to have the desired result, although I'm wondering if this is really the best way to support using an OO package like this from either a package definition in the same file as main:: or a real module file included with require.
Below is the admittedly contrived proof-of-concept example. Yes, it's a bit silly (my original problem dealt with an OO class that ships its own DBI and SQLite RDBMS, including self-provided schema. Rest assured the example is simply to avoid all of that nonsense in learning how namespace and scoping works!)
Of note here is that removing the BEGIN block surrounding the $data definition prevents the code from ever getting executed, which causes the program to abort during the sanity-check within the text() method.
I'm curious if this is an intentional design limitation of Perl, or merely a side-effect of putting my main:: package code before the Foo::Bar package code. I understand that a require() call will execute the non-subroutine code in the package at that point, but this seems to be in contradiction to how subroutines work; I can call sub_foo() before declaring it, but apparently can't do this with in-file packages.
Here's the proof-of-concept code: