Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Looking for CPAN module author: Daniel Yacob (String::LCSS)

by mr_mischief (Monsignor)
on Jan 07, 2016 at 20:19 UTC ( #1152244=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Looking for CPAN module author: Daniel Yacob (String::LCSS)
in thread Looking for CPAN module author: Daniel Yacob (String::LCSS)

I hit him up on Twitter with a reference to this thread, letting him know that if he's the right person you're looking to contact him. No telling if he'll respond. I imagine if he's this hard to reach about the module he won't mind having another maintainer anyway.

  • Comment on Re^3: Looking for CPAN module author: Daniel Yacob (String::LCSS)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Looking for CPAN module author: Daniel Yacob (String::LCSS) -- SOLVED
by toolic (Bishop) on Jan 08, 2016 at 13:11 UTC
    Thanks for the effort. About a week ago, I updated the OP, but no doubt it is easy to miss. I am now a co-maintainer. I was unable to contact the author, but I was granted permissions by the powers that be. I uploaded a new version of String::LCSS.
        Yes, I've considered it, but I'm currently using a private CVS repo :( It's on my list of things to do to migrate it to git.

      I didn't miss it. I just thought the extra communication might be helpful. It turns out Daniel wants no part of the module these days and says he'll follow up.

Re^4: Looking for CPAN module author: Daniel Yacob (String::LCSS)
by stevieb (Abbot) on Jan 08, 2016 at 00:25 UTC

    If toolic hasn't had any positive response from the author by now, he's taken the proper approach, and it would be justified to properly take ownership of the module.

    Ironically, it was toolic himself (amongst others) who advised me how to do this 5+ years ago in this PerlMonks post prior to me taking one over, so if he hasn't asked for ownership yet, he definitely knows the process ;)

      I never meant to imply that toolic's actions weren't justified. However, I thought the parties involved might still want to discuss whether the old maintainer wanted to still play any part. As it turns out, Daniel Yacob wants no part of the module and says he should've deleted it. He also says he'll follow up. Now toolic doesn't need to worry about showing justification to an old maintainer who comes back, because the old maintainer confirmed he isn't interested in coming back to the module.

        That's great news! I want you to know that I didn't mean to imply that you were implying that toolic wasn't aware of the procedure. I apologize if that's how I came off. What I said was meant for future readers :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1152244]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-02-21 11:57 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    When it is dark outside I am happiest to see ...














    Results (279 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?