Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: RFC: Edit your posts in a separate page, rather than at the top of a thread.

by Discipulus (Canon)
on Mar 10, 2016 at 08:12 UTC ( [id://1157268]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RFC: Edit your posts in a separate page, rather than at the top of a thread.

good! the edit part is in fact an obstacle to the clean read of a thread: in fact when root msg me that i have a reply i click on my own post rather than directly on the reply.

Is this new edit page overriding the user prefences related to eight and width of the textarea ? i find myself with a withd 100% but with a too little height; i've played with On-Site CSS Markup: that now is set to textarea { width: 100%} but i got overlapped textarea with height 100%

L*

There are no rules, there are no thumbs..
Reinvent the wheel, then learn The Wheel; may be one day you reinvent one of THE WHEELS.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Edit your posts in a separate page, rather than at the top of a thread.
by jdporter (Paladin) on Mar 10, 2016 at 19:05 UTC
    Is this new edit page overriding the user prefences related to eight and width of the textarea ?

    No. Same as always. Our code hard-codes the size to 80x30 (characters).

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1157268]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (8)
As of 2024-04-23 14:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found