Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Syntactic Confectionery Delight

Re: (OT) Pending Anti-Terrorism Legislation in the US could impact us all

by srawls (Friar)
on Oct 01, 2001 at 03:29 UTC ( #115772=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to (OT) Pending Anti-Terrorism Legislation in the US could impact us all

Before I begin, let me state that I am very patriotic, and it is because of that I write what I do:

Maybe I'm overly paranoid. Maybe I'm over reacting. Maybe I'm even wrong. But I am certainly amazed by the number of people who have no idea of what is occurring in Washington right now.

Over reacting ... of course not. It was Benjamin Franklin (one of our founding fathers) who said: "He who would give up essential liberty for some temperary safety deserves niether liberty nor safety." This is why I am very wary of any piece of law that would somehow allow the government to conduct themselves without evidence that would withstand in court. Also, about the computer crimes: When I saw on slashdot that this was true, I almost didn't believe it. I think this is wrong and the punishment certainly does not fit the crime ... indeed, we already have laws against such acts of 'cracking,' why change them now?

I have yet to hear a credible reason from the Federal Government as to the causes of this. Geo. W. Bush's canned attack on freedom sounds weak to me, some patriotic propaganda. Ah, well ...

Patriotic propaganda? No, mabey overly idealistic, but I like it. Certainly, the reason these terrorist hate us so much is not because of us, but our ideals, our beliefs ... our freedoms. So, in a sense, it was an attack on freedom.

The 15 year old, sophmore programmer,
Stephen Rawls

  • Comment on Re: (OT) Pending Anti-Terrorism Legislation in the US could impact us all

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://115772]
[1nickt]: Haha, I was learning about Linux filesystem trees trying to understand how Moo fits.
[1nickt]: I just got my feet wet with some DBIC coding this last week. I feel "meh" about it so far. It was pretty easy to add a sub to the DBIC class to filter search results ...
[1nickt]: ... in the calling code ... $rs = $rs->maturity(" stable");. But I don;t enjoy feeling that far away from the SQL and the DB, really.
[1nickt]: The same project (CPAN Testers API) is using experimental signatures (and therefore 5.024) ... which is what replaced Method::Signatures , afaict.
[1nickt]: But the new $job is on an older Perl and therefore using M::S, the syntax of which looks clunky to me, so far.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-11-24 13:31 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    In order to be able to say "I know Perl", you must have:

    Results (349 votes). Check out past polls.