Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node

by Your Mother (Archbishop)
on May 04, 2016 at 12:45 UTC ( [id://1162183]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node
in thread unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node

Be fair. The age of a domain registration has no correlation with the number of links that 200 or 404. This is in line with my complaints about IRC. If the code was meant to survive it should have gone on PM, which I see you have done. This raises a side-issue not mentioned. You broke the law by posting it. Since there is no license associated with the code it’s © all rights reserved; in the US at least. I understand this is a silly and irrelevant distinction but it’s worth noting that only the author has the legal right to publish the code until it has a CC or OSI or similar license and the author chose to not publish it on PM.

I didn’t vote to reap it, by the way, and wouldn’t. I vote to keep things, like misspellings in titles, against the general tide because PM isn’t a reference work and I think premature normalization is a mistake.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1162183]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-03-19 11:19 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found