Re^10: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks

Re^10: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?

by perl-diddler (Chaplain)

on Sep 20, 2016 at 19:52 UTC ( [id://1172241]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?
in thread BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?

Where do I get access and how do I update the existing code?

I'm more than happy to look at the problem and see if I'm able to do anything about it.

Comment on Re^10: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? by hippo (Bishop) on Sep 20, 2016 at 22:52 UTC
See the section "So You'd Like To Join An Order" in What are PerlMonks Orders? with particular reference to pmdev.	[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion

Log In^?

Domain Nodelet^?

www.com | www.net | www.org

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://1172241]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? • Last hour • Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others wandering the Monastery: (5)

As of 2024-04-23 06:49 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Today I Learned

Voting Booth^?

No recent polls found