Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^10: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)
on Jan 16, 2017 at 22:33 UTC ( [id://1179715]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^9: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?
in thread [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
  • Comment on Re^10: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^11: [Answered; thanks.] Can this be explained in layman's terms?
by jdporter (Paladin) on Jan 17, 2017 at 14:31 UTC

    Empty words, belied by your previous comment.

      Clever enough to know that your entire intervention serves no good purpose. The question was asked and answered, then you stuck your oar in. What a mess.

      And now it seems for some reason you just can't let it go?

      If you were really concerned about the title, of this non-entity of a thread, you have the power to change it.

      Why haven't you? Because that is not your purpose, and never was. Now I suggest you simply stop embarrassing yourself.


      With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
        Because that is not your purpose, and never was.

        It certainly was, but I figured (wrongly?) that it would better to defer to you, the OP, a seasoned perlmonks veteran, to improve the title yourself.

        Since you've elected instead to dig in your heels under the flag of a feigned artlessness, I may do it. Or I may decide that it wouldn't be worth the time.

        your entire intervention serves no good purpose

        I put a consideration on my initial reply, to have it yoinked over into its own PMD thread, but, alas, the consensus is unanimously against me (so far).

        What a mess.

        Imagine how much less of a mess we'd have if you had simply taken my original suggestion and improved the title, rather than getting all bent about it.

        I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
        A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
      A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1179715]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others learning in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-23 20:46 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found