Re: Nodelet style broken?
by beech (Parson) on Jan 25, 2017 at 02:25 UTC
|
Hi, There has been no actual CSS changes, one of the
gods is messing with the themes ("html")
they switched out the table/tbody/tr/td with div tags and didn't update the css
original
<!--nodelet handling code (monktainer)-->
<td width="20%" valign="top" align="right" class="nodelets">
<!-- Begin nodelets -->
<table class='nodelet_container' id='nodelet_container'>
<!-- Nodelet Break -->
<tbody class="nodelet" id="Tick_tock">
new <!--nodelet handling code (monktainer)-->
<td width="20%" valign="top" align="right" class="nodelets">
<!-- Begin nodelets -->
<div class='nodelet_container' id='nodelet_container'>
<!-- Nodelet Break -->
<div class="nodelet" id="Log_In">
<div class="nodelet_head">
experiment or amateur hour? | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
| [reply] |
Re: Nodelet style broken?
by herveus (Prior) on Jan 24, 2017 at 20:44 UTC
|
Howdy!
I can reproduce the behavior in Firefox, Chrome, and IE on Windows. And it isn't happening here where I'm logged in.
| [reply] |
Re: Nodelet style broken?
by Corion (Patriarch) on Jan 26, 2017 at 18:20 UTC
|
I've now added what I believe is a faithful replication of the old TABLE paths for the new DIV nodes in nodelets to css/common.css. This should address the font sizes I presume.
I have not looked through the themes to see whether they need adjustment as well.
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
Thanks. The font is smaller, but the blue borders and headers are still missing.
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Nodelet style broken?
by SuicideJunkie (Vicar) on Jan 24, 2017 at 19:28 UTC
|
I'm seeing it too, but only when logged out.
I had assumed it was just IT and their glitchy hijinks again and ignored it, but if you're seeing it too, then it is probably real.
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] [d/l] |
Re: Nodelet style broken?
by GrandFather (Saint) on Jan 24, 2017 at 19:41 UTC
|
What browsers and versions have you tried? Could it be a browser update?
Premature optimization is the root of all job security
| [reply] |