Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Unable to front-page [id://1181114]

by LanX (Saint)
on Feb 05, 2017 at 12:11 UTC ( [id://1181130]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Unable to front-page [id://1181114]

Just a guess:

edit history says it was moved to mediations and back.

I think this somehow broke the mechanism, we had similar issues with such dependencies in the past.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Je suis Charlie!

  • Comment on Re: Unable to front-page [id://1181114]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Unable to front-page [id://1181114]
by Arunbear (Prior) on Feb 05, 2017 at 15:53 UTC
    No, it was broken before that. This was to test if front paging would work if the node was re-sectioned (it still didn't work).
Re^2: Unable to front-page [id://1181114]
by kcott (Archbishop) on Feb 06, 2017 at 20:36 UTC

    So, the editing wasn't the issue: Corion has identified the root cause; and, as Arunbear indicates, the editing occurred later.

    I was aware that moving pages between sections had, in the past, caused problems with both approval and front-paging operations — given the node was by a first-time poster, using the wrong section was certainly a possibility — however, I didn't know how to check this. There was no indication in the thread that anyone had done this; I also checked "Nodes to Consider" to see if a "move to section ..." was perhaps in progress (it wasn't).

    Anyway, thanks to your "edit history" link, I find I can just add ";displaytype=edithistory" to the query string to get this information. This will be useful, not just in similar situations to this one, but also when considering empty nodes: Edit (to restore content) or Reap (it's genuinely empty). With that in mind, is this functionality available from, say, some Nodelet, or do I need to manually edit the URL?

    — Ken

      I wouldn't say the root cause is found.

      Regarding "node history" check the "approval nodelet".

      But better don't be too optimistic, imho it doesn't show much more than changes triggered from the approval nodelet.

      Cheers Rolf
      (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
      Je suis Charlie!

        Thanks for the speedy reply.

        "I wouldn't say the root cause is found."

        That's a fair enough comment. I've <del>eted the word "root" from that sentence.

        I seem to recall that, long ago, I did try that "node history" link on quite a few posts. It always told me:

        "This node has not been edited yet."

        I just tried it again, on one of my nodes that I knew I had edited, and got the same result. It doesn't look like it'll be much good when "considering empty nodes" (as I suggested earlier).

        — Ken

Re^2: Unable to front-page [id://1181114]
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Feb 05, 2017 at 13:22 UTC

    I wonder why such an experienced monk would move such an obvious SoPW to Meditations, and then back again; all within the same minute.

    For the side effects perhaps?


    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1181130]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-19 23:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found