Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: problem with WWW::Mech

by morgon (Priest)
on Feb 11, 2017 at 21:27 UTC ( [id://1181758]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: problem with WWW::Mech (updated)
in thread problem with WWW::Mech

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: problem with WWW::Mech
by Laurent_R (Canon) on Feb 11, 2017 at 21:59 UTC
    you are just guessing here.
    Many answers on this site are guess work (at least in part), for many reasons, such as the question not being very clear or the difficulty to figure out or emulate the OP's setting.

    You're asking a question and then being arrogant with someone trying to help you. This is unfair and impolite.

    I'm really not doing that often, but I downvoted your post for that.

      "You're asking a question and then being arrogant with someone trying to help you. This is unfair and impolite."

      Agreed. It's one thing to disagree while providing updates to your own findings and explain them reasonably, but belligerence is a pretty sad way to reply to a legitimate attempt to help. Responding with "Whatever" to LanX's original reply is pretty dismissive, and a good way to get people to hold back on providing any thoughts that may help on future requests for assistance.

        Responding with "Whatever" to LanX's original reply is pretty dismissive, and a good way to get people to hold back on providing any thoughts that may help on future requests for assistance.

        Hi,

        Isn't that a positive thing? If you've already checked and know the ideas/guesses are wrong, why wouldn't you reject/dismiss them?

        Here is the weird part, LanX acknowledges his guesses are wrong ( Without /print version you should see something like ) but still keeps guessing? Why not reject that?

        If you believe the OP has a problem, why not believe the OP when he says he checked it? And says it a second time? And you confirm it? Is that the kind of help you want?

        I visited the website with browser(firefox/chrome...), saw a warning Register to read 3 articles each week, or subscribe for full access.

        After clicking and "reading" three different articles I saw the contents disappear and a message appear Subscribe now for full access or register to continue reading. You have reached your article limit

        Adding /print at the end of the url made the article appear again and remain (not disappear)

        I disabled javascript and kept reading articles with no warnings on content disappearing

        It is clear what happens, the website sets a cookie and the article is hidden using javascript

        Of course thats what it had to be since it worked with wget

        I hope all participants can honestly learn something from this thread and that it doesn't involve feelings

        morgon++

        LanX--, Laurent_R--, stevieb--

        Smile Hug Repeat

          A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
      A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^5: problem with WWW::Mech
by LanX (Saint) on Feb 11, 2017 at 21:31 UTC
    Sorry for trying to help you, won't happen again.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
    Je suis Charlie!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1181758]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-16 07:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found