Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
Re^3: Faster lockingby bbs2web (Acolyte) |
on Apr 04, 2017 at 08:16 UTC ( [id://1186966]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Could someone please confirm that Perl would skip trying to acquire a lock when the first 'if' condition is true? Should I rather place the test in to a nested condition, completely outside of the first? if ( (1 == 1) || (!flock $lockfile, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB) )PS: Things appear to be working as expected, but I would still like to know, for my own peace of mind.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|