Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^6: 'do' command is dead? Surely not?

by dasgar (Curate)
on May 19, 2017 at 18:24 UTC ( #1190664=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^5: 'do' command is dead? Surely not?
in thread 'do' command is dead? Surely not?

Here's one blog post that describes some background of the situation. Here's a blog post from Brian D. Foy talking about '.' being removed from @INC in 5.26.

Also, it's documented in the perldelta for 5.24.1.

And there's also a CVE for this issue too (CVE-2016-1238).

  • Comment on Re^6: 'do' command is dead? Surely not?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: 'do' command is dead? Surely not?
by KurtZ (Pilgrim) on May 19, 2017 at 21:44 UTC
    Great thanks!

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1190664]
help
Chatterbox?
[Corion]: Hmm - I think I'm not really making friends at $work. "We" (as in $current_project) should enter some Changes into the system, and I just told the Transition Manager, who should do that or tell somebody to do that to learn the system in which they ...
[Corion]: ... should create that Change.
[Corion]: The nicer approach maybe would have been to indirectly tell them that, or tell them who could teach them...
[erix]: No More Mr Nice Guy !

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (10)
As of 2017-10-23 12:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My fridge is mostly full of:

















    Results (279 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?