Re: defunct process are WAY beyond my experienc

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Comment on Re: defunct process are WAY beyond my experienc

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: defunct process are WAY beyond my experienc by choroba (Cardinal) on Jul 05, 2017 at 09:25 UTC
See e.g. Re: Gtk2 app on Windows, driving a background process for an explanation of the term "discouraged". ($q=q:Sq=~/;[c](.)(.)/;chr(-\|\|-\|5+lengthSq)`"S\|oS2"`map{chr \|+ord }map{substrSq`S_+\|`\|}3E\|-\|`7**2-3:)=~y+S\|`+$1,++print+eval$q,q,a, [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^2: defunct process are WAY beyond my experienc by Anonymous Monk on Jul 05, 2017 at 02:30 UTC
I would be interested to know from other Monks Then why don't you search for it ? I mean you've dispensed enough "expert" advice over the years you should already know the answer to a question the OP never asked	[reply]
Re^3: defunct process are WAY beyond my experienc by cristj1 (Novice) on Aug 10, 2017 at 18:50 UTC
I finally got to the bottom of why my script and threads were hanging. This glibc patch fixed the problem. Bug 906468 - Deadlock in glibc between fork and malloc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906468	[reply]