### Re^7: High Performance Game of Life

by tybalt89 (Priest)
 on Aug 13, 2017 at 16:50 UTC ( #1197335=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^6: High Performance Game of Life
in thread High Performance Game of Life

Try this. Notably faster on my machine that is horribly slower than yours.

```package Organism;

use strict;
# use warnings;

sub count {
return scalar keys %{ shift->{Cells} };
}

# Input a list of [ x, y ] coords
sub insert_cells {
my \$cells = shift->{Cells};
for my \$r (@_) { \$cells->{ pack 'i2', @{\$r} } = undef }
}

# Return sorted list of cells in the Organism.
# Used for verification and testing the state of the organism.
sub get_live_cells {
sort { \$a->[0] <=> \$b->[0] || \$a->[1] <=> \$b->[1] }
map { [ unpack 'i2', \$_ ] }
keys %{ shift->{Cells} };
}

sub tick {
my \$self  = shift;
my \$cells = \$self->{Cells};
my ( \$k1, \$k2, \$k3, \$k4, \$k5, \$k6, \$k7, \$k8,
\$x0, \$x1, \$x2, \$y0, \$y1, \$y2, %new_cells, %dead_cells );

for my \$c (keys %{ \$cells }) {
# Get the (up to 8) dead cells surrounding the cell
( \$x0, \$y0 ) = unpack 'i2', \$c;
( \$x1, \$x2, \$y1, \$y2 ) = ( \$x0 - 1, \$x0 + 1, \$y0 - 1, \$y0 + 1 );
\$dead_cells{\$_}++ for my @zcells = (
(\$k1 = pack 'i2', \$x1, \$y1) x !(exists \$cells->{\$k1}),
(\$k2 = pack 'i2', \$x1, \$y0) x !(exists \$cells->{\$k2}),
(\$k3 = pack 'i2', \$x1, \$y2) x !(exists \$cells->{\$k3}),
(\$k4 = pack 'i2', \$x0, \$y1) x !(exists \$cells->{\$k4}),
(\$k5 = pack 'i2', \$x0, \$y2) x !(exists \$cells->{\$k5}),
(\$k6 = pack 'i2', \$x2, \$y1) x !(exists \$cells->{\$k6}),
(\$k7 = pack 'i2', \$x2, \$y0) x !(exists \$cells->{\$k7}),
(\$k8 = pack 'i2', \$x2, \$y2) x !(exists \$cells->{\$k8}) );

# Check the live cell
# Note: next line equivalent to nlive == 2 || nlive == 3
@zcells == 5 || @zcells == 6 and \$new_cells{\$c} = undef;
}
+s;
\$self->{Cells} = \%new_cells;
}

sub new {
my \$class = shift;
my %init_self = ( Cells => {} );
bless \%init_self, \$class;
}

1;

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: High Performance Game of Life
by marioroy (Priest) on Aug 13, 2017 at 18:11 UTC

Hi tybalt89. The optimization is awesome.

Update 1: Bit-manipulation will not work when \$y is negative. See this post. I assumed that \$y was always positive from testing using the initial test script.

Update 2: See this post for a version that maps two integers into one integer successfully.

I tried bit-manipulation by mapping \$x and \$y into \$n. 16-bits is enough to hold \$y.

```package Organism;

use strict;
# use warnings;

sub _pack {
my ( \$x, \$y ) = @_;
\$x < 0 ? -(abs(\$x) << 16 | \$y) : \$x << 16 | \$y;
}

sub _unpack {
my ( \$n ) = @_;
return \$n < 0
? ( -( abs(\$n) >> 16 ), abs(\$n) & 0xFFFF )
: (        \$n  >> 16  ,     \$n  & 0xFFFF );
}

sub count {
return scalar keys %{ shift->{Cells} };
}

# Input a list of [ x, y ] coords
sub insert_cells {
my \$cells = shift->{Cells};
for my \$r (@_) { \$cells->{ _pack @{\$r} } = undef }
}

# Return sorted list of cells in the Organism.
# Used for verification and testing the state of the organism.
sub get_live_cells {
sort { \$a->[0] <=> \$b->[0] || \$a->[1] <=> \$b->[1] }
map { [ _unpack \$_ ] }
keys %{ shift->{Cells} };
}

sub tick {
my \$self  = shift;
my \$cells = \$self->{Cells};
my ( \$k1, \$k2, \$k3, \$k4, \$k5, \$k6, \$k7, \$k8,
\$x0, \$x1, \$x2, \$y0, \$y1, \$y2, %new_cells, %dead_cells );

for my \$c (keys %{ \$cells }) {
# Get the (up to 8) dead cells surrounding the cell
( \$x0, \$y0 ) = \$c < 0
? ( -( abs(\$c) >> 16 ), abs(\$c) & 0xFFFF )
: (        \$c  >> 16  ,     \$c  & 0xFFFF );

( \$x1, \$x2, \$y1, \$y2 ) = ( \$x0 - 1, \$x0 + 1, \$y0 - 1, \$y0 + 1 );

\$dead_cells{\$_}++ for my @zcells = (
(\$k1 = \$x1 < 0 ? -(abs(\$x1) << 16 | \$y1) : \$x1 << 16 | \$y1) x
+ !(exists \$cells->{\$k1}),
(\$k2 = \$x1 < 0 ? -(abs(\$x1) << 16 | \$y0) : \$x1 << 16 | \$y0) x
+ !(exists \$cells->{\$k2}),
(\$k3 = \$x1 < 0 ? -(abs(\$x1) << 16 | \$y2) : \$x1 << 16 | \$y2) x
+ !(exists \$cells->{\$k3}),
(\$k4 = \$x0 < 0 ? -(abs(\$x0) << 16 | \$y1) : \$x0 << 16 | \$y1) x
+ !(exists \$cells->{\$k4}),
(\$k5 = \$x0 < 0 ? -(abs(\$x0) << 16 | \$y2) : \$x0 << 16 | \$y2) x
+ !(exists \$cells->{\$k5}),
(\$k6 = \$x2 < 0 ? -(abs(\$x2) << 16 | \$y1) : \$x2 << 16 | \$y1) x
+ !(exists \$cells->{\$k6}),
(\$k7 = \$x2 < 0 ? -(abs(\$x2) << 16 | \$y0) : \$x2 << 16 | \$y0) x
+ !(exists \$cells->{\$k7}),
(\$k8 = \$x2 < 0 ? -(abs(\$x2) << 16 | \$y2) : \$x2 << 16 | \$y2) x
+ !(exists \$cells->{\$k8}) );

# Check the live cell
# Note: next line equivalent to nlive == 2 || nlive == 3
@zcells == 5 || @zcells == 6 and \$new_cells{\$c} = undef;
}
+s;
\$self->{Cells} = \%new_cells;
}

sub new {
my \$class = shift;
my %init_self = ( Cells => {} );
bless \%init_self, \$class;
}

1;

Regards, Mario

You need to run the following little test to catch any errors with negative x and y values before firing off any benchmarks:

```# tgol.t - Simple blinker test of Conway Game of Life Organism class
use strict;
use warnings;
use Organism;
use Test::More;
my \$ntests = ( \$nblinks + 1 ) * 3;
plan tests => \$ntests;

sub test_one {
my \$org = shift;         # Organism handle
my \$desc = shift;        # Test description
my \$expected = shift;    # Array ref of (sorted) expected cells
my \$nexpected = @{\$expected};
my \$ncells = \$org->count();
my @cells = \$org->get_live_cells();
cmp_ok( \$ncells, '==', \$nexpected, "\$desc cell count (\$ncells)" );
cmp_ok( scalar(@cells), '==', \$nexpected, "\$desc cell array count"
+);
is_deeply( \@cells, \$expected, "\$desc cell array" );
}

[ -101, -100 ], [ -100, -100 ], [  -99, -100 ],
[ -101,  100 ], [ -100,  100 ], [  -99,  100 ],
[   -1,    0 ], [    0,    0 ], [    1,    0 ],
[   99, -100 ], [  100, -100 ], [  101, -100 ],
[   99,  100 ], [  100,  100 ], [  101,  100 ],
);
[ -100,  -99 ], [ -100, -100 ], [ -100, -101 ],
[ -100,   99 ], [ -100,  100 ], [ -100,  101 ],
[    0,   -1 ], [    0,    0 ], [    0,    1 ],
[  100,  -99 ], [  100, -100 ], [  100, -101 ],
[  100,   99 ], [  100,  100 ], [  100,  101 ],
);
my @sblinker1 = sort { \$a->[0] <=> \$b->[0] || \$a->[1] <=> \$b->[1] } @b
my @sblinker2 = sort { \$a->[0] <=> \$b->[0] || \$a->[1] <=> \$b->[1] } @b

# Initialization
my \$org = Organism->new();

# Pattern should just blink back and forth
for my \$i ( 1 .. \$nblinks ) {
\$org->tick();
}
with the command line:
```prove tgol.t
Unfortunately, your latest effort fails this test on my machine as shown below:
```#   Failed test 'initial cell count (11)'
#   at tgol.t line 17.
#          got: 11
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'initial cell array count'
#   at tgol.t line 18.
#          got: 11
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'initial cell array'
#   at tgol.t line 19.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          \$got->[0][0] = '-281474976710655'
#     \$expected->[0][0] = '-101'

#   Failed test 'blinker 1 cell count (10)'
#   at tgol.t line 17.
#          got: 10
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 1 cell array count'
#   at tgol.t line 18.
#          got: 10
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 1 cell array'
#   at tgol.t line 19.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          \$got->[0][0] = '-281474976710655'
#     \$expected->[0][0] = '-100'

#   Failed test 'blinker 2 cell count (11)'
#   at tgol.t line 17.
#          got: 11
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 2 cell array count'
#   at tgol.t line 18.
#          got: 11
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 2 cell array'
#   at tgol.t line 19.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          \$got->[0][0] = '-281474976710655'
#     \$expected->[0][0] = '-101'

#   Failed test 'blinker 3 cell count (9)'
#   at tgol.t line 17.
#          got: 9
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 3 cell array count'
#   at tgol.t line 18.
#          got: 9
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 3 cell array'
#   at tgol.t line 19.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          \$got->[0][1] = '99'
#     \$expected->[0][1] = '-101'

#   Failed test 'blinker 4 cell count (9)'
#   at tgol.t line 17.
#          got: 9
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 4 cell array count'
#   at tgol.t line 18.
#          got: 9
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 4 cell array'
#   at tgol.t line 19.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          \$got->[0][1] = '100'
#     \$expected->[0][1] = '-100'

#   Failed test 'blinker 5 cell count (8)'
#   at tgol.t line 17.
#          got: 8
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 5 cell array count'
#   at tgol.t line 18.
#          got: 8
#     expected: 15

#   Failed test 'blinker 5 cell array'
#   at tgol.t line 19.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          \$got->[0][1] = '99'
#     \$expected->[0][1] = '-101'
# Looks like you failed 18 tests of 18.

I left this tgol.t test program out of the root node because it was already way too long ... then forgot about it. Sorry 'bout that. Update: I've now remedied my oversight by adding the tgol.t test program above to the root node.

Hi eyepopslikeamosquito. Yes, I've been running tgol2.t found here and it's been running fine. I can comfirm that bit-manipulation is failing with the new tgot2.t. The initial test script did not test for negative \$y. Thus, assumed that \$y was always positive. The bit-manipulation code will no longer work.

Okay, will comment readers to your post and strike out the bit-manipulation sections. Thank you for posting Extra Test Program tgol.t.

Update: For closure, I tested mapping supporting negative \$x and \$y. Pack('i2') is faster unless running cperl.

```use strict;
use warnings;
use Time::HiRes qw(time);

my ( \$x , \$y , \$iters ) = ( -890394, 100, 5_000_000 );
my ( \$xx, \$yy, \$n );

##
# sub _pack {
#    my ( \$x, \$y ) = @_;
#    return
#       \$x < 0 ? -( abs(\$x) << 16 | \$y ) : \$x << 16 | \$y;
# }
#
# sub _unpack {
#    my ( \$n ) = @_;
#    return \$n < 0
#       ? ( -( abs(\$n) >> 16 ), abs(\$n) & 0xFFFF )
#       : (        \$n  >> 16  ,     \$n  & 0xFFFF );
# }
##

bench( "bitops     ", sub {
# map two integers \$x and \$y into \$n
# support negative \$x only
for ( 1 .. \$iters ) {
\$n = \$x < 0 ? -( abs(\$x) << 16 | \$y ) : \$x << 16 | \$y;
( \$xx, \$yy ) = \$n < 0
? ( -( abs(\$n) >> 16 ), abs(\$n) & 0xFFFF )
: (        \$n  >> 16  ,     \$n  & 0xFFFF );
}
});

##
# sub _pack {
#    my ( \$x, \$y ) = @_;
#    # bits 0,1 indicate neg flag for \$x,\$y respectively
#    return
#       ( abs(\$x) << 18 ) + ( \$x < 0 ? 1 : 0 ) +
#       ( abs(\$y) << 2  ) + ( \$y < 0 ? 2 : 0 );
# }
#
# sub _unpack {
#    my ( \$n ) = @_;
#    # bits 0,1 indicate neg flag for \$x,\$y respectively
#    return (
#       \$n & 0x1 ? -(\$n >> 18        ) : \$n >> 18,
#       \$n & 0x2 ? -(\$n >> 2 & 0xFFFF) : \$n >> 2 & 0xFFFF
#    );
# }
##

bench( "bitops neg ", sub {
# map two integers \$x and \$y into \$n
# support negative \$x and \$y
for ( 1 .. \$iters ) {
\$n = ( abs(\$x) << 18 ) + ( \$x < 0 ? 1 : 0 ) +
( abs(\$y) << 2  ) + ( \$y < 0 ? 2 : 0 );
( \$xx, \$yy ) = (
\$n & 0x1 ? -(\$n >> 18        ) : \$n >> 18,
\$n & 0x2 ? -(\$n >> 2 & 0xFFFF) : \$n >> 2 & 0xFFFF
);
}
});

bench( "(un)pack ii", sub {
for ( 1 .. \$iters ) {
\$n = pack 'ii', \$x, \$y;
( \$xx, \$yy ) = unpack 'ii', \$n;
}
});

bench( "(un)pack i2", sub {
for ( 1 .. \$iters ) {
\$n = pack 'i2', \$x, \$y;
( \$xx, \$yy ) = unpack 'i2', \$n;
}
});

exit;

sub bench {
my ( \$start, \$desc, \$fcn ) = ( scalar time, @_ );
\$fcn->();
printf "duration \$desc  %0.03f\n", time - \$start;
}

Regards, Mario

Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1197335]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (2)
As of 2018-05-26 20:06 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
Voting Booth?
World peace can best be achieved by:

Results (194 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices?