There appear to be what I'll assume are typos in two considerations.

The nodes in question are:

#1199646 was considered for reaping as a dupe of itself. I suspect that should have been "a dupe of #1199658" (although that one was posted about three hours later). Anyway, as you can see above, #1199646 has been reaped: unless there's some administrative reason to change the consideration text, there's probably nothing more to be done about that.

I replied to #1199646 (Re: Splitting a file based on matched conditions). My post has been considered for reparenting to #1199646 (its original and current parent). That consideration should also have probably referenced #1199658 for the new parent. I have no problem with the reparenting; however, as it stands, the consideration is confusing: maybe a quick s/46/58/ to fix.

— Ken