print "You replied to the wrong node again.\n" x 163;
I always thought it was simple incompetence but now wonder if it's a tactic to avoid rebuttal by flying under the replied messages radar.
…somehow have managed to come away from all those years without knowing what the fsck I am talking about, about anything whatsoever. … Meanwhile, it just isn’t true.
In two short paragraphs, you were wrong five times. And on at least one of them, FastCGI and PSGI, you've been corrected here before; more than once. Though I suppose it's not much of record since you were able to be wrong four times in four words once. Nearly always without contrition or accepting and applying correction.
If you posted a correct answer, I would upvote you like I upvote other monks with whom I have beef. I am positive I would like you in person which is why it's so maddening to slowly end up unambiguously despising you professionally.
You have no sworn enemies. You have at least 30 monks who are tired of you ruling Worst Nodes because your posts contain such a high ratio of erroneous and detrimental content while acting like you are a peer while putting in none of the effort, help, or understanding. And it's deeply insulting. Most of the senior monks here have put in many hours of their own time working on answers for others (sometimes many hours on a single answer), writing tutorials, studying to catch up on topics, optimizing code, writing tests, code diving and reading documentation to find elusive answers, playing with the compiler, rewriting parts of core perl. Where did you put in effort the effort to even run a snippet of code? What do you offer besides hand waving aphorisms and a dearth of technical expertise sprinkled with broken anecdote?
Not to worry. The Perl skill and expertise you avow has been well documented. We are now in the indexing, citations, and footnotes phase of the project. It's really up to you how much deeper the compendium becomes. | 