Anyone, named or otherwise, who makes baseless, bizarre claims and bloviates without evidence, citations, logic, defense against counter arguments is, uh, well, I wouldn't say "bum" unless I were doing shtick, let's say not bringing value. Your post reads like a pamphlet from The Ministry of Truth. Political winds being what they are, you may yet live long enough to see your true calling become a paid and pensioned position. | [reply] |
One will allow — no, not allow, it will obligate — the policing of content
Most (if not all) ISPs want the protections afforded by "Common Carrier" status, but not the obligations.
Common Carrier status grants immunity from liability for the content in exchange for carrying all content on a non-discriminatory basis. ISPs want the immunity from liability even when they control the content.
| [reply] |
