Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Regexps for Parsing Brackets in Chemical Formulae

by Elgon (Curate)
on Nov 05, 2001 at 09:26 UTC ( #123283=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Regexps for Parsing Brackets in Chemical Formulae
in thread Regexps for Parsing Brackets in Chemical Formulae

Stefp,

Muchas gracias - one minor alteration to take account of the fact that certain artificial elements have, under certain nomenclatures, three letters rather than one or two...

s/([A-Z](?:[a-z]{0,2})?)(\d*)/  $count{$1} += $2 ? $2  : 1 ;''/eg;

Otherwise, perfect!

Ta, Elgon.

"Without evil there can be no good, so it must be good to be evil sometimes.
--Satan, South Park: Bigger, Longer, Uncut.


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Regexps for Parsing Brackets in Chemical Formulae
Download Code
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Regexps for Parsing Brackets in Chemical Formulae
by stefp (Vicar) on Nov 07, 2001 at 22:27 UTC
    Not quite perfect:

       s/([A-Z][a-z]{0,2})(\d*)/ $count{$1} += $2 ? $2 : 1 '' /eg;

    is cleaner. The (?:) was a unneeded left-off in my code and when you added the {0,2} modifier, the ? modifier became redundant. Or {2}? could be used instead of {0,2}.

    Strangely for the golfers {,2} is not supported; it should be expected to be supported because {2,} is.

    -- stefp

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://123283]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-05 05:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (60 votes), past polls