Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery

Re: Re: Re: MySQL / Perl Question

by Masem (Monsignor)
on Nov 10, 2001 at 21:43 UTC ( #124575=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: MySQL / Perl Question
in thread MySQL / Perl Question

I assume you're talking about this line:
my ( $count ) = $sth->fetchrow_array();
fetchrow_array() returns an array. If you assign it like:
my $count = $sth->fetchrow_array();
assuming the SQL that I gave as an example, $count will always equal 1, the scalar context of the array on the right hand side. The parans are there to keep the array context and are quite necessary in this case.

Dr. Michael K. Neylon - || "You've left the lens cap of your mind on again, Pinky" - The Brain
"I can see my house from here!"
It's not what you know, but knowing how to find it if you don't know that's important

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re4: MySQL / Perl Question
by blakem (Monsignor) on Nov 11, 2001 at 13:42 UTC
    fetchrow_array() returns an array. If you assign it like:
    my $count = $sth->fetchrow_array();
    $count will always equal [the] scalar context of the array
    Subroutines return lists not arrays. A list is a series of scalars, an array is a bag that contains a list.

    Therefore, $count will be the scalar context of the list. Lists in scalar context evaluate to the their rightmost element. If you actually wanted the behavior you describe above, you'd need to put it inside a "list bag", more commonly called an array:

    my $count = @{[ $sth->fetchrow_array() ]};
    In this case $count would be the number of elements returned, namely 1.


Re4: MySQL / Perl Question
by blakem (Monsignor) on Nov 12, 2001 at 13:20 UTC
    After giving what I believed to be a complete answer yesterday, I realized that it still wasn't quite correct. It is true that subroutines return lists not arrays, but when called in scalar context they dont necessarily return the scalar value of that list.

    The most obvious example of this is localtime() whose return values in scalar and list context have little to do with one another. Another example happens to be fetchrow_array()

    From the DBI pod:

    In a scalar context, fetchrow_array returns the value of the first field. An undef is returned if there are no more rows or if an error occurred. Since that undef can't be distinguished from an undef returned because the first field value was NULL, you should exercise some caution if you use fetchrow_array in a scalar context.
    Using my logic, in scalar context we'd get the last field not the first.

    The moral of the story is that the behavior of a subroutine in scalar context can't be determined from its list context return value.

    Here are three subs that return the same values in list context, but behave differently in scalar context:

    #!/usr/bin/perl -wT use strict; sub test1 { return @{[ qw(A B C) ]}; } sub test2 { return qw(A B C); } sub test3 { return wantarray ? qw(A B C) : 'I like jellybeans'; } print "List context\n", " test1: ", join(', ',test1()), "\n", " test2: ", join(', ',test2()), "\n", " test3: ", join(', ',test3()), "\n", "\nScalar context\n", " test1: ", scalar test1(), "\n", " test2: ", scalar test2(), "\n", " test3: ", scalar test3(), "\n"; =OUTPUT List context test1: A, B, C test2: A, B, C test3: A, B, C Scalar context test1: 3 test2: C test3: I like jellybeans


Re: Re: Re: Re: MySQL / Perl Question
by gloryhack (Deacon) on Nov 10, 2001 at 22:40 UTC
    I find an interesting bug in the following example:
    #!/usr/bin/perl my @array = qw(fred ethel ricky lucy); my $scalar = @array; print $scalar, "\n"; exit;

    perl seems to be using a character set that creates the numeral one in a glyph that's just like the US English numeral four. Odd.

      SELECT COUNT(*) returns a single value. fetchrow_array returns an array. If you put the two together, you'll get the row count returned in a single-element array. Here's the correct example:
      my @array = (42); my $count = @array; my ($elem) = @array; print "$count element, which is ($elem)\n";

      Update: Oops, it does return a list. The specification even says that it returns the value of the first field in scalar context (a little wantarray action). I'd have missed the boat completely if it didn't go on to warn about calling it in scalar context, though I didn't read that initially.

      Hey everyone, look over there => !

        Actually, fetchrow_array returns a list not an array. It makes a big difference in this discussion. Consider the following code:
        #!/usr/bin/perl -wT use strict; my @array = (42); my $array_count = @array; # array in scalar context my $list_count = (42); # list in scalar context my $sub_count = testsub(); # list or array???? print "Array in scalar context: $array_count\n", "List in scalar context: $list_count\n", "Subs rv in scalar context: $sub_count\n"; sub testsub { # does this return a list or an array???? return (42); } =OUTPUT Array in scalar context: 1 List in scalar context: 42 Subs rv in scalar context: 42
        The array evaluates to its number of elements, but the list evaluates to its rightmost member - in this case 42. The return value from the subroutine is actually a list not an array, which explains why $sub_count == $list_count == 42.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://124575]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (2)
As of 2017-08-23 03:09 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Who is your favorite scientist and why?

    Results (345 votes). Check out past polls.