entity relationship modeling

[moo]

hello all,

the point to my last question regarding accessing the text of an icon was to find out about HOW perl sets up the relationship between icons.

for example: x = 1;

seems simple enough, but the relationship may be described as:

entity relation entity

looks like three thingies. but, there are actually 5 thingies...within the spaces between each the entity and relation is "something" that does the binding. i'm looking for that "something".

why? the main reason behind this is that we can use this stuff as a model for programming objects...emulate that binding in the "how" during the design phase. it'll also help us think about what perl is doing in the background and any useful side effects.

i've started my research with chapter 3, Advanced Perl Programming and am wading through it. i really like the notion of truly lexical entities.

anyone have some insight into this stuff?

thanks,

moo

Edit ar0n -- removed <pre> tags

[Zaxo]

Consider:

$x=1;

One answer to your specific question is that the token '=' is recognised by Perl as an operator which demands an argument on each side. Following rules of precedence, Perl looks left for an 'lvalue' which can be assigned to, and an 'rvalue' to the right from which to draw the new value.

Your way of expressing the question suggests that you are unfamiliar with Perl syntax and spoken conventions. Perhaps The Llama or The Camel would serve you better for now, and make the excellent Black Cat more accessible.

After Compline,
Zaxo

[jepri]

I've been batting this sort of thing around for a compiler (not perl) and like Zaxo says, it translates into an "assign" operation. In more detail, it becomes:

left-value operator expression

which roughly translates into a conceptual function like assign(left-value, eval(expression)). As to assigning relationships, the parser builds a tree. I'm not familiar with perl's tree, but it would probably look a little like this:

     =
    / \
   x   1

That is, the '=' is the important parent and the x and the 1 are arguements to it.

Is that what you were looking for?

____________________
Jeremy
I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.

[moo]

thanks for the reply jeremy!

what is (are) your source(s) for the above?

thanks,

moo

[jepri]

At first I fumbled around and got it by accident. Then I found a post by Brent Dax on the Perl 6 mailing list called "babyperl.pl" which is a mini perl parser, and took that apart.

I also have some books, one by Niklaus Wirth called "Compiler Construction". Check the comp.compilers homepage for Jack Crenshaw's excellent "Let's write a compiler" online tutorial. The page also has other resources that are very handy indeed.

Finally, /msg me... I'm in the middle of writing a pascal compiler so I'm facing the same issues you are looking at.

____________________
Jeremy
I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.