Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

(jcwren) Re: Re: The Ovidian Transform

by jcwren (Prior)
on Jan 01, 2002 at 00:05 UTC ( #135421=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: The Ovidian Transform
in thread The Ovidian Transform

While the lack of error checking would certainly be foolish, you can micro-optimize this even more.

The while() loop isn't smart enough to compile down to a 'scasb' instruction, whereas if you use 'memchr', the compiler is smart enough to play some games with it. While I haven't checked the code strncpy() uses, I know for a fact that memcpy() will reduce to either a 'rep movsb' sequence, or more likely for only 8 bytes, 2 loads and 2 stores (4 instructions). If you're on an Alpha, it'll be 2 instructions, a single load and a single store.

strncpy() is portable and is good in that respect. memcpy() is less so, since it presumes certain things about the processor architecture.

/me is glad to see Ovid start hacking Inline::C. It's a lot of fun. Perl is good, but not always perfect. Perl combined with Inline::C can let you do some truly scarey things.

--Chris

e-mail jcwren


Comment on (jcwren) Re: Re: The Ovidian Transform

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://135421]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-03 20:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (56 votes), past polls