Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Perl's rank among languages

by arhuman (Vicar)
on Jan 03, 2002 at 12:56 UTC ( #135941=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Perl's rank among languages
in thread Perl's rank among languages

Ok! I may have "overreacted" a litlle bit...

You're definitly right...

I must admit that this guy take special care to describe it works as it is rather than a "proof" of language efficiency...

Sometimes I'm just not helping with my advocacy.

It's just a test. The author admit it can be biased. This guy made a pretty huge (and good) work anyway (even if I'd like to see some better Perl code). Perl isn't placed the way it should to my mind. Some Perl code could be enhanced. PERIOD.

Thanks for your patience (trying to calm me down) and your objectivity.
(Am I becoming a Perl integrist ?)


"Only Bad Coders Code Badly In Perl" (OBC2BIP)
  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Perl's rank among languages

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://135941]
help
Chatterbox?
[Discipulus]: marto also Re^2: Catalyst:: Dispatcher - usage of expand_actions has signature polemic, and yesterday was quoted in CB
[marto]: Discipulus concerned partys should report things. as tye mentioned in his post (linked in the other thread from yesterday) there is an approach and strategy for such things
[Discipulus]: which node yesterday?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (9)
As of 2017-06-23 08:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How many monitors do you use while coding?















    Results (538 votes). Check out past polls.