Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?

by dws (Chancellor)
on Jan 03, 2002 at 22:45 UTC ( [id://136037]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?

I really like it, and am likely to abandon the for(;;) construct permanently in favor of the above idiom. Should I repent?

One of the tradeoffs you'll need to consider when making this decision is whether readability suffers when your loop gets to be more than an eyefull. A non-loop scope is a common idiom, particularly when the intent it to temporarily localize variables. When I read

{ local $/ = undef; ...
I think to myself, "ah, slurp mode," not "I wonder if this is going to be a loop?" I then read on with a mental context set. But if 15 lines down I enounter last or redo, I have a moment of confusion to work through that wouldn't have been there if the scope had started with   while ( 1 ) { or   for ( ; ; ) {

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://136037]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-20 07:34 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found