Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options

Re(3): do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?

by dmmiller2k (Chaplain)
on Jan 04, 2002 at 21:27 UTC ( #136314=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?
in thread do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?

Just curious. Why would you prefer this:

{ # do stuff last if BREAK-CONDITION; redo; }

to this:

{ # do stuff redo if !BREAK-CONDITION; }

or even (just to be pedantic),

{ # do stuff redo unless BREAK-CONDITION; }


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(tye)Re3: do/redo or for(;;): what's Kosher?
by tye (Sage) on Jan 05, 2002 at 05:38 UTC

    I'm pretty sure that the reason is:

    { # do loop stuff to be done at least once last if BREAK-CONDITION; # do middle loop stuff <<< This part was left out redo; }
    which I'd still use while(1) for. Plus it allows you to do:
    { # read next line last if NoMoreLines # extract item from line redo if NoItemInLine last if EndOfItemListFound # categorize item redo if WrongItemCategory # check for updates redo if NoUpdatesThisCategory; # check permissions last if NoUpdatesAllowed; redo if ThisUpdateNotAllowed; # do update redo if NotFatal; # handle fatal error # (note, no "redo" here so this part isn't really # part of the "loop", just stuff to do once unless # "last" gets triggered above.) } # done with items
    where it is very easy to throw in a new check or new code in. But, as I said elsewhere, I find that power to be too easy to abuse. YMMV.

            - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")

      Ah, in that context, I see where this approach could be useful.

      I think I agree with you, though, that the while (1) (with scattered nexts in place of redos) accomplishes the same thing in a more self-explanatory way.


      You can give a man a fish and feed him for a day ...
      Or, you can
      teach him to fish and feed him for a lifetime

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://136314]
[Tanktalus]: LanX: yes :) I haven't tried java, but I have this match working in its bastard cousin, C# :) I just thought perl's unicode support would get me there :)
[LanX]: I have my doubts, IMHO its a workaround if the glyph is missing
[LanX]: (they are pronounced differently)
[choroba]: perl -Mutf8 -Mfeature=fc -wE 'say fc "straße" eq fc "strasse"'
[choroba]: returns 1 for me
[choroba]: are they?
[LanX]: strict rules : the a is long in "straße" and short in "strasse"
[choroba]: So the "a" is different, not the "s" ;-)
[LanX]: people knowing that it's a workaround will pronounce it right
[LanX]: well

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2018-03-21 15:45 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    When I think of a mole I think of:

    Results (268 votes). Check out past polls.