Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Nested subs - inherently evil?

by chromatic (Archbishop)
on Feb 11, 2002 at 21:05 UTC ( [id://144704]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Nested subs - inherently evil?
in thread Nested subs - inherently evil?

Note that the filehandle is "local" and not "my".
What is the purpose of this?

Localizing a typeglob (let us be accurate here: what we call a "filehandle" is a typeglob from which Perl automagically extracts the IO slot) temporarily makes a different referent available by the same name. This is handy for avoiding conflicts elsewhere.

The alternative to your construct, using a lexical to contain a glob reference is also automagically understood by Perl and is, of course, lexically scoped.

At the risk of severe understatement, local is designed to allow scoped modifications of global names. It produces no special magic for filehandles (with the appropriate understanding that there is severe magic in perlio that doesn't apply here).

In other words, you can do it this way, but I can't see where it does you any good, since the standard approach does the same thing more idiomatically.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Nested subs - inherently evil?
by traveler (Parson) on Feb 11, 2002 at 22:17 UTC
    This results from my initially localizing the glob itself as in:
    sub foo { local *FH = shift; ... read FH, ... }
    I realized it was more straightforward to use $whatever, but neglected to change the local to a my.

    --traveler

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://144704]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-23 23:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found