Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: We Stylin'!

by belg4mit (Prior)
on Feb 12, 2002 at 22:22 UTC ( #145009=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: We Stylin'!
in thread We Stylin'!

I think perhaps you must misunderstand me. Yes DIV and SPAN are by far the best tools for clustering content in a general application. But this is not a general application, we have pre-existing container elements (nodelets) which will not be disappearing, and so it seems it would be most effecient to refer to these than add addiotional elements.

--
perl -pe "s/\b;([st])/'\1/mg"


Comment on Re: Re: Re: We Stylin'!
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: We Stylin'!
by AidanLee (Chaplain) on Feb 12, 2002 at 22:37 UTC

    Ah, I see I did misunderstand. My appologies

    Yes, we should definitely take advantage of labeling the existing container classes. The issue I see is popping open the source code to the page is that these container classes aren't implemented as containers. There just a few table cells here and there. Nodelets aren't even their own tables, but rather table rows in the larger table. I'd love to see something like:
    <div id="main" > <div id="node_content"> </div> <div id="node_replies"> ... </div> </div> <div id="sidebar"> <div id="nodelet_xp"> </div> <div id="nodelet_chatterbox"> </div> ... </div>

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://145009]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (16)
As of 2015-07-30 19:17 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (273 votes), past polls