Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (Ovid - let's look at this again) Re: RFC CGI.pm refactoring

by tachyon (Chancellor)
on Feb 16, 2002 at 00:21 UTC ( #145791=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (Ovid - let's look at this again) Re: RFC CGI.pm refactoring
in thread RFC CGI.pm refactoring

Thanks for your post Ovid As it happens I have posted the relevant benchmarks at CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough? The title is self explanatory but the actual results are interesting. You may not have realised how much of a performance penalty use strict; applies for instance.

cheers

tachyon

s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print


Comment on Re: (Ovid - let's look at this again) Re: RFC CGI.pm refactoring
Re^3: RFC CGI.pm refactoring
by webmaster33 (Initiate) on May 09, 2006 at 00:41 UTC
    Read about module the bugs. These bugs should be fixed:
    http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Cgi-Simple

    Best regards,
    Webmaster33

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://145791]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (11)
As of 2014-08-22 19:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (163 votes), past polls