Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: (Ovid) Re(3): CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?

by IlyaM (Parson)
on Feb 16, 2002 at 22:24 UTC ( #145908=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (Ovid) Re(3): CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?
in thread CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?

In reality under mod_perl there is no good reason not to just use CGI.pm as the load time, size, etc is not an issue and it is well proven.

In reality under mod_perl there is no good reason not to just use Apache::Request as it is smaller, faster and it is well proven :)

--
Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)


Comment on Re: Re: (Ovid) Re(3): CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://145908]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (16)
As of 2015-07-02 16:48 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (44 votes), past polls