Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: (Ovid) Re(3): CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?

by IlyaM (Parson)
on Feb 16, 2002 at 22:24 UTC ( #145908=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: (Ovid) Re(3): CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?
in thread CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?

In reality under mod_perl there is no good reason not to just use CGI.pm as the load time, size, etc is not an issue and it is well proven.

In reality under mod_perl there is no good reason not to just use Apache::Request as it is smaller, faster and it is well proven :)

--
Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)


Comment on Re: Re: (Ovid) Re(3): CGI::Simple vs CGI.pm - Is twice as fast good enough?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://145908]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-07-29 12:46 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (217 votes), past polls