Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Performance quandary

by mattr (Curate)
on Feb 26, 2002 at 07:20 UTC ( #147499=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Performance quandary

Yes (tilly), I see. I read at Sleepycat that B-tree wins over hash, and then (if/when prescaled B-tree size exceeded) the hash wins again, but that sounds like just doing it wrong. I bow to your experience.

My gut instinct was to leave all seeking and logic to a trigger in the DB, but say we just use Perl - how to get more detailed profiling info to find the culprit? We don't have info about these objects but how about the general case..

I thought about the cache digest bitmap in Sourceforge squid docs, which uses 1 bit is used per object. This led me to imagine using a sequential memory map for 2 million objects, each of which contains address of parent and some other data. But realized locality in B-tree must beat this..

Any ideas as to performance if you

1) maintained memory map with Inline::C function which includes address of parent, an access counter, and a couple extra bytes. say 16MB for map plus an 8MB pool of free addresses. (or is this moot due to locality win in B-tree)
or
2) skip the memory map, but also
a) maintain a medium size B-tree of popular object MD5s, which are found because a counter in each object is incremented on seek. Added to populars tree when exceeding a pretuned threshold., hopefully this is searched very frequently instead of the big tree.
and
b) maintain a small hash to cache last X number of objects and cut churn.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://147499]
help
Chatterbox?
[jdporter]: is there a module for expanding tabs in text?
[jdporter]: A: yes.
[Lady_Aleena]: I don't know how hard it will be to get out of that mess.
[LanX]: M-x untabify
[choroba]: I don't think they're multiple people. I was told "he or she" sounds old-fashioned and "they" is the way to say it
[pryrt]: Those others were definitely offensive or unequivocably rude, I agree.
[choroba]: (well, it comes from the 14th century, so labelling it as "modern" doesn't seem appropriate)
[Your Mother]: "They" is becoming accepted but it irritates me sometimes. I tend to just pick she or he randomly or try to use "one."
LanX thinks it is appropriate here :)
[Your Mother]: They would think so.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (17)
As of 2017-05-24 20:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?