Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

•Re: Re: •Re: Re: Re: perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider

by merlyn (Sage)
on Mar 14, 2002 at 20:08 UTC ( #151809=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: •Re: Re: Re: perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider
in thread perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider

However, I do think perl2exe is a necessary program if the community wants to be able to freely distribute Perl code to people without the interpreter.
The problem is that it doesn't scale. For the second program, they get a second copy of the interpreter. For the third program, they get a third copy of the interpreter. And it's not small. {grin}

Activestate have done a wonderful job making a very very easy to install Perl distribution available for free. If you can't trust them to install Activestate Perl, why in the world trust them to install and use your program?

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker

  • Comment on •Re: Re: •Re: Re: Re: perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re(6): perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider
by Flame (Deacon) on Mar 14, 2002 at 21:15 UTC
    Lol, true. I think there are options to build it with the DLL 'shared' on some of the PL2EXE programs. I think PerlApp does.

    Overall, I'm not too happy with the 'compilers' but I doubt they will be going away any time soon.



    "Weird things happen, get used to it."

    Flame ~ Lead Programmer: GMS

Re: •Re: Re: •Re: Re: Re: perl2exe Evaluation Message Avoider
by kevin_i_orourke (Friar) on Mar 15, 2002 at 12:35 UTC
    If you can't trust them to install Activestate Perl, why in the world trust them to install and use your program?

    Because they've paid you for it? I find that being abusive to customers (however stupid) is bad for business.

    Kevin O'Rourke

      Because they've paid you for it? I find that being abusive to customers (however stupid) is bad for business.

      How do "evaluation message avoider" and "they've paid for it" go together? If they have paid, you can buy the program.

      I disagree on using perl2exe, though. I think such a program should be open source or at least free without a nagging message. The idea of compiling a binary by combining interpreter and sources is a good idea, but should not be used to hide the source code.

      Besides, you could always create your own installer using one of the many installation-wizard-creators and install Perl unless already installed.

      U28geW91IGNhbiBhbGwgcm90MTMgY
      W5kIHBhY2soKS4gQnV0IGRvIHlvdS
      ByZWNvZ25pc2UgQmFzZTY0IHdoZW4
      geW91IHNlZSBpdD8gIC0tIEp1ZXJk
      

        How do "evaluation message avoider" and "they've paid for it" go together? If they have paid, you can buy the program.

        I thought the topic had moved away from the specific "evaluation message avoider" problem and seemed to be more about the pros and cons of these 'compilers'.

        Kevin O'Rourke

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://151809]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (2)
As of 2018-01-21 10:50 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?










    Results (227 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?