|Keep It Simple, Stupid|
Re: Optimizing Outputby stephen (Priest)
|on Apr 15, 2002 at 05:49 UTC||Need Help??|
I threw together some bizarre benchmarking code to see how much the two methods differ on my machine. The difference was more than I expected... but I pretty much don't believe my results. Code below, once I finish explaining why one should ignore it completely. :)
The old adage is that "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." Yet another true cliche is that 80% of processing is performed in 20% of all code. Optimizing before profiling the code to find out where it's spending time can waste your life away, and lead you to sacrifice readability and maintainability where it isn't necessary to do so.
I second what dws said. I would go a step further, perhaps: write the code in the most readable and maintainable way you can. If one is going to be interpolating enough variables and subroutines that this question becomes worth thinking about, then it's time to consider using a templating system like The Template Toolkit or Text::Template. Many templating systems precompile themselves, so that they are nearly the same speed as either method.
Just for laughs, here's a code snippet that performs a rough-and-ready (read: probably meaningless) comparison of building up a string for appending versus printing a long list:
Update: Forgot to include the code results:
Seems in the expected direction, but I doubt the numbers themselves a great deal.