note
Juerd
<p>
According to some theory that I can't recollect entirely, and for that reason I have absolutely no clue about who should get credit for it, "good" does not exist, and one can only speak about "better". And even that is purely subjective.<BR><BR>
However, I do like to think that I'm good. Not because I really am, but because the thought of having reached an absolute and unreachable point in the knowledge hierarchy pleases me. No, I'm not good at all, I'm just a bit better than those who have just started, which makes sense because they have yet to build up experience.<BR><BR>
Because there is no good, there will always be better. Although I have come from not using strict, lexicals, modules or even warnings, I now love strict, lexicals, modules and warnings. My recent code is often object oriented instead of the "line noise with a function" I used to write. I didn't know I was going to learn to like these things, and I didn't know I would ever see the OO-light. What is to come is unknown, but we learn all the time.<BR><BR>
As long as only perl can parse Perl, humans will never be able to comprehend all of its secrets and actually remember them all. That is not necessarily a bad thing.
</p>
<p><font color=green><pre>
- Yes, I <a href="http://plp.juerd.nl/" target="_blank"><font color="green">reinvent</font></a> wheels.
- Spam: Visit <a href="http://eurotraq.com/" target="_blank"><font color="green">eurotraQ</font></a>.
</pre></font></p>
160420
160420