Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Indicators for user experience

by Dog and Pony (Priest)
on May 19, 2002 at 11:47 UTC ( #167641=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Indicators for user experience

No. Plain and simple, no.

Voting should in my opinion be done on the nodes, and *your* perception of the quality of them. It shouldn't be based on what someones rank is - especially not something like these ranks, that only give a hint that the person might know more or less.

Saints make mistakes, and AnonyMonk might correct them. I dare say that it is often the other way around, but it happens. :) How would you vote then?

And how will you ever learn to determine the quality of an answer, if all you have to go on is "Master X said so"?

If you have no own opinion, save the vote for a node where you do. That is *my* opinion. :)


You have moved into a dark place.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.


Comment on Re: Indicators for user experience

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://167641]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (9)
As of 2015-07-02 05:25 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (29 votes), past polls