I'm with Abigail-II on this one: it isn't so much
that PerlMonks is "just" full of young geeks, but that
it has a large contingent of people whose opinions (and
"knowledge") is based more on how they feel the law
should be interpreted, rather than on how it has
been in the past. More to the point, it's those people
("us", I should probably say, since I'm doubtless one
of them) who are likely to reply to any request quickly
and passionately, and provide heated (and probably bad)
legal opinion. I'd expect this to happen regardless of
whether they're slashdotties, skr1pt k1dd135, or mature
thinkers.
Case in point: is it legal to rip tracks off of
several CDs and burn them onto a compilation? I'd
expect that many Monks (I am among them) think it's
perfectly legal -- fair use and all that -- but RIAA
would have you believe otherwise... and to the best of
my knowledge, this hasn't been tested in court since
some of the scarier new legislation came into effect.
If this was a potential legal problem of mine, I
wouldn't want to be misled into thinking that my case
was stronger than reality would dictate. Hence: go to
a lawyer.
So while the starting point PerlMonks might provide
would be good and valid, it would (probably) also be
biased, maybe dangerously.
--
The hell with paco, vote for Erudil!
:wq
| [reply] |
Fair enough, and you're certainly right. What I objected to actually is the "full of young geeks" bit in Abigail-II's argument; not really the fact that PM was not where to get serious legal advice.
Look again and I think you'll find we pretty much agree. ++ for pointing out a few good points.
____________ Makeshifts last the longest.
| [reply] |