Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW

Re: Re: Productivity and Perl

by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 02, 2002 at 14:49 UTC ( #171029=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Productivity and Perl
in thread Productivity and Perl

Actually the code-length point isn't Paul Graham's. It is Fred Brooks', Paul merely happened to agree with it.

The point appears in The Mythical Man-Month and was based on audits that showed that programmers in different languages were getting the same amount of code written per day in the end, even though that code did very different amounts of stuff.

The cause appeared to be that higher-order languages offer higher-order concepts, and as a result the programmers menally "chunk" at a higher level at first, and then find it easier to debug later because there is less code to understand. For a trivial example, how much do Perl's memory management and hashes reduce the amount of code needed when going from C to Perl, and speed up the programmer?

While it is easy to find plenty of counter-examples (such as your Scheme continuation versus a loop), as a rule of thumb for real projects it really does seem to work.

Comment on Re: Re: Productivity and Perl

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://171029]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-07-30 15:41 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:

    Results (235 votes), past polls