Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re: •Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code

by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 12, 2002 at 15:27 UTC ( #173866=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to •Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code
in thread Obfuscation has no place in production code

I hardly think you are responsible for obfuscated Perl. Purposefully obfuscating code has been around for a lot longer than Perl.


Comment on Re: •Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code
:>:> •Re: Obfuscation has no place in production code
by ignatz (Vicar) on Jun 12, 2002 at 15:36 UTC
    Merlyn wasn't taking credit for all code obfuscation. As for the JAPH, his place in history seems to have been well documented.
    ()-()
     \"/
      `                                                     
    
      Yes I know perfectly well about the history of JAPH's. To suggest that "the whole obfu-perl" is a direct descendant of his original JAPH's is just plain silly.
        God forbid we should ever be silly. Better to be anonymous charmers spreading the love.
        ()-()
         \"/
          `                                                     
        

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://173866]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-07-02 04:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (27 votes), past polls