Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: GOTO considered (a necessary) evil?

by Joost (Canon)
on Jul 16, 2002 at 09:49 UTC ( #182028=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: GOTO considered (a necessary) evil?
in thread GOTO considered (a necessary) evil?

If your target label in a goto is undefined, perl won't complain until it tries to actually execute the goto, even when using strict and warnings. If your goto is handling a "once in a thousand years" case, then you're likely not to notice this typo until it's too late.

Ofcourse, you have the same problem if you use a subroutine/method call (though you would probably not use those in the same situation).

Myself, I would prefer

while (1) { .... .... last unless (EXPR); }
Which makes very clear that this is a loop (even though it might not loop more than once 99% of the time) and it "forces" some structure (which is not always a bad thing), and it might make you see the problem from a new perspective - TIMTOWDI after all.
-- Joost downtime n. The period during which a system is error-free and immune from user input.


Comment on Re: Re: GOTO considered (a necessary) evil?
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://182028]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (9)
As of 2015-07-29 01:03 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (260 votes), past polls