Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: (tye)Re: GOTO considered (a necessary) evil?

by Anonymous Monk
on Jul 16, 2002 at 11:11 UTC ( #182038=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: (tye)Re: GOTO considered (a necessary) evil?
in thread GOTO considered (a necessary) evil?

I didn't misunderstand. I was just not clear enough.

I meant that to be a resource you can use in discussions with people whose understanding of structured programming is more religious than practical.

As for goto, very few are "necessary", and experience says that so-called necessary gotos generally have a better replacement. Furthermore the ability to combine loop control and named loops removes the vast majority of goto statements - including every one that Knuth pointed to in his rebuttal as being useful for algorithmic efficiency. So while I might agree that necessary gotos are OK, I likely mean something different by that than you do.


Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: (tye)Re: GOTO considered (a necessary) evil?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://182038]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-12-20 20:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (98 votes), past polls