Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: DBI specification change

by bronto (Priest)
on Jul 16, 2002 at 15:58 UTC ( #182124=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: DBI specification change
in thread DBI specification change

You got a point here.

My reply, anyway, was triggered by this paragraph of gmax posting...

I am posting this warning because I have seen some SOPWs where people were using this particular idiom.

...and triggered that consideration of mine, which is general and not limited to DBI, that version n.m+1 shouldn't break any code that works with n.m. In case something could be broken, one should choose a new M>>m, obviously IMHO. No attempt to blame to DBI people there ;-)

Ciao!
--bronto

Update: Edited the HTML, misplaced tag

# Another Perl edition of a song:
# The End, by The Beatles
END {
  $you->take($love) eq $you->made($love) ;
}


Comment on Re: Re: Re: DBI specification change

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://182124]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-08 02:15 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (93 votes), past polls