Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re: RFC: Entity names for square brackets.

by erikharrison (Deacon)
on Jul 22, 2002 at 01:00 UTC ( #183905=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to RFC: Entity names for square brackets.

The Engine introduces us to some additional metachars, the square brackets. I think that this is too specific a patch. What I'd *really* like to see is something tilly mentioned once. I'd like PM to support a backslash escape. This would allow me to backslash those pesky square brackets and also backwhack angle brackets, while creating a potential extendable metachar system if the Monastery ever needs one, all in manner consistent with the way we all think of escapes in Perl.

That aside, my vote is for &lsqb and &rsqb :-). Also, if the patch is in, one way or another, then maybe this should be a poll?


Light a man a fire, he's warm for a day. Catch a man on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchet

Comment on Re: RFC: Entity names for square brackets.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://183905]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-10-06 17:40 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (156 votes), past polls