Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: problem in mod_perl installation

by fuzzyping (Chaplain)
on Jul 29, 2002 at 04:41 UTC ( #185884=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: problem in mod_perl installation
in thread problem in mod_perl installation

While I can appreciate the effort you've put into researching this, I can't identify with the drawbacks of mod_perl DSO vs. the advantages/conveniences of running them. Particularly if you're not having any problems with them at all. The worst disadvantage I could pull out of the guide is probably the 20% slowdown at server startup. So what?

With respect to the rest of the guide cons, most of those are very platform-specific, and don't sound applicable to Linux. As far as the mod_perl-list thread is concerned, the reader lays it out there... yes, it appears this individual may be having problems with DSO and mod_perl, but the alternative is to compile Apache without any DSO support? Come on!

It appears that you're applying a handful of individual's specific problems to the whole DSO bunch. I run DSO's pretty religiously without any problems (granted, I'm also not hosting anything with serious volume), as well as thousands of other folks out there.

Again, just my $0.02. Feel free to disagree. :)

-fp


Comment on Re: Re: problem in mod_perl installation
Re: Re: Re: problem in mod_perl installation
by Chmrr (Vicar) on Jul 29, 2002 at 06:21 UTC
    As far as the mod_perl-list thread is concerned, the reader lays it out there... yes, it appears this individual may be having problems with DSO and mod_perl, but the alternative is to compile Apache without any DSO support? Come on!

    Ahem. ;>

    This "mod_perl DSO == bad" approach that I am coming from is not so much the result of an evening of research, but more the result of over a year lurking on the mod_perl lists. You are not the first to challenge that most of the eviednce against DSOs is anecdotal -- again, see the list.

    Also just my two cents. Personally, I have seen no reason not to compile it statically, and some personal experience with segfaults caused by mod_perl as a DSO. Hence, I will continue to err on the side of caution (and also speed :) and build mod_perl in statically.

    perl -pe '"I lo*`+$^X$\"$]!$/"=~m%(.*)%s;$_=$1;y^`+*^e v^#$&V"+@( NO CARRIER'

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://185884]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2014-11-29 03:49 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My preferred Perl binaries come from:














    Results (203 votes), past polls