Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re: Re: Re: problem in mod_perl installation

by Chmrr (Vicar)
on Jul 29, 2002 at 06:21 UTC ( #185899=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: problem in mod_perl installation
in thread problem in mod_perl installation

As far as the mod_perl-list thread is concerned, the reader lays it out there... yes, it appears this individual may be having problems with DSO and mod_perl, but the alternative is to compile Apache without any DSO support? Come on!

Ahem. ;>

This "mod_perl DSO == bad" approach that I am coming from is not so much the result of an evening of research, but more the result of over a year lurking on the mod_perl lists. You are not the first to challenge that most of the eviednce against DSOs is anecdotal -- again, see the list.

Also just my two cents. Personally, I have seen no reason not to compile it statically, and some personal experience with segfaults caused by mod_perl as a DSO. Hence, I will continue to err on the side of caution (and also speed :) and build mod_perl in statically.

perl -pe '"I lo*`+$^X$\"$]!$/"=~m%(.*)%s;$_=$1;y^`+*^e v^#$&V"+@( NO CARRIER'

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: problem in mod_perl installation

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://185899]
and a soft breeze sighs...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others lurking in the Monastery: (8)
As of 2017-03-23 21:28 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?

    Results (294 votes). Check out past polls.